| Autor |
Tema: [Mafia] Wild Wild West [Game Over] |
3357 respuestas
|
|
|
|
Great game Joel. Interesting and intriguing setup. Well done and thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
How am I being a knob? FFS lighten the hell up
|
|
|
|
I meant what I said about not caring if I got lynched or not. Town were well ahead of schedule so it was whatever. I'm always a lynch candidate when games get to a tipping point regardless of my alignment because people just don't trust me even if I look town and they never rule out that I haven't been fooling people all along. I take it as a compliment.
Obviously I knew I wasn't scum though which is why I did manage to re-read and come back & make a case on Kirsty. I got frustrated with it because I knew I was right.
It wasn't Sudeep's fault I got lynched even though he played that entire day like a child with his finger trapped in a car door. It took the other sleep-walking townies to do it as well.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Daryl Gee @ January 19th 2017,19:59:47 ) So technically, I died as town, so won?
Technically, yes. :)
|
|
|
|
The only *facepalm* moment I had was the amount of night actions I was apparently being accused with.
I gave Stuart a cake, and made a kill, and blocked Curtis
Then the following night I had to kill Stuart to stop him from using the PR.... that came from the cake..... that I gave to him myself .......
seriously.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Phil Maunder @ January 19th 2017,20:50:19 ) The only *facepalm* moment I had was the amount of night actions I was apparently being accused with.
I gave Stuart a cake, and made a kill, and blocked Curtis
Then the following night I had to kill Stuart to stop him from using the PR.... that came from the cake..... that I gave to him myself .......
seriously.
You're just that good.
|
|
|
|
|
people didn't even mention that a scum me would mean bussing Eduardo. Or admitting to visiting Stuart when I didn't have to...
|
|
|
|
Kirsty used her 1 cake interception and then bluff she got intercepted herself to her advantage. I think she could have pulled a better case on Ivelin actually having a gun but Phils Day 4 stopped her from claiming that. Would have made it closer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for playing guys and try the alcoholic thing out in future games for me, as it failed too early this game.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for hosting Joel it was fun :)
to me it wasn't bastard, just complicated.
needed mOaR votecounts! and linking the game events into the OP :]
|
|
|
|
|
If I said Ivelin had a gun, he himself would be certain I was lying, and for the others it would be jsut me or him, figured by saying intercepted it left everyone under a bit of suspicion. Just one more lynch! Its all I needed!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought you played pretty well Kirsty
|
|
|
|
|
She wasn't ob scum like you Riley ;)
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Phil Maunder @ January 19th 2017,20:58:07 ) needed mOaR votecounts! and linking the game events into the OP :]
Yeah, I was going to try and make some chrome add-on to do vote counts automatically, all I would need to do is press go, well that project can go sit with the rest of them, might try it in the summer though.
|
|
|
|
Kirsty I trusted to a strong town meta on you early in the game :)
But like I say I got suspicious towards the end of day 3 when I felt like a town Kirsty would be doing more to try & home in on who else must be lying about their claim other than Riley.
Then at the end of the day I can't remember what you said exactly but when I said I wanted to wait & re-read but won't get chance till Tuesday you basically accused me of trying to avoid a Riley lynch. That was proper shit-slingy & you lost all of your town creds with me for that :)
|
|
|
|
|
Not followed the game or read what happened so don't know circumstances, but Quote ( Ivelin Dobrev @ January 19th 2017,19:57:18 )
Quote ( Curtis Larade @ January 19th 2017,19:49:06 )
Well we won Ivelin soooo uhhh duh my play was perfect
In reality, I'll just claim D1 with my first post that I'm cop
Or you investigate the person you find most scummy!
Why should a cop investigate the person they find most scummy? It's a possibility if they have doubts, but can also be predictable if the person is under suspicion, so more likely to have a result manipulated if they are likely to draw investigation.
Furthermore, as cop, I tend not to go for my scummiest read regardless but use the ability to investigate people I'm much more undecided about. I like to trust my reads and use the investigation as an "extra" to help forum opinion of someone I don't feel I have an opinion about.
|
|
|
|
You should read and see the circumstances. It's not a lot actually.
Maybe like the last 500-600 posts.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Ivelin Dobrev @ January 19th 2017,23:11:45 ) You should read and see the circumstances. It's not a lot actually.
Maybe like the last 500-600 posts.
Just looked at the post count, 3350 is really impressive for a 13 player game :)
|
|
|
|
|
Jimmy only had two melt-downs as well
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Kirsty Ridley @ January 8th 2017,19:57:56 ) Can we get a vote count? I think we should just lynch eduardo, now, today
LUL
|
|
|
|
|
:P but no one noticed how many times I stalled it until later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I should have noticed it at the time
|
|
|
|
yep, I was sure someone would. I was pushing while trying to distract. Then just gve up and let him get lynched lol
|
|
|
|
|
On the re-read it was when you even considered Jimmy. I mean why would you bother lol
|
|
|
|
|
That was difficult, I really tried hard at playing drunk :)
|
|
|
|
|
The Phil lynch was completely and utterly dumb btw
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Daryl Gee @ January 19th 2017,19:59:47 ) So technically, I died as town, so won?
Congratz Daryl
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ January 19th 2017,22:50:31 ) Not followed the game or read what happened so don't know circumstances, but Quote ( Ivelin Dobrev @ January 19th 2017,19:57:18 )
Quote ( Curtis Larade @ January 19th 2017,19:49:06 )
Well we won Ivelin soooo uhhh duh my play was perfect
In reality, I'll just claim D1 with my first post that I'm cop Or you investigate the person you find most scummy!
Why should a cop investigate the person they find most scummy? It's a possibility if they have doubts, but can also be predictable if the person is under suspicion, so more likely to have a result manipulated if they are likely to draw investigation.
Furthermore, as cop, I tend not to go for my scummiest read regardless but use the ability to investigate people I'm much more undecided about. I like to trust my reads and use the investigation as an "extra" to help forum opinion of someone I don't feel I have an opinion about.
This is true but in thus case. Curtis should have investigated one of Kirsty/Phil/Ivelin because Alex and I were pretty much clear after the Riley flip. But he investigated Alex anyway.
Cop is better used in players you can't read accurately and on players you think are less likely to get killed.
|
|
English
Deutsch
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
