|
Forum ketjun kysely
The New F1 Points System
Kirjaudu äänestääksesi tai tarkastaaksesi tulos
|
| Aloittaja |
Aihe: The New F1 Points System |
156 vastausta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 04:18:24
|
Quote
|
|
This should have been years ago ......... Motor-GP like
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 05:02:03
|
Quote
|
You know a sport is in trouble when they keep messing with the rules every year
Just leave it alone for cryin' out loud. Get some stability. If it's not the points, it's the Qualifying, or Slicks/no slicks, or 1 or 2 tyre manufacturers, or wings, or engine capacity, or fueling ....
the list goes on..
A few changes ocassionally is expected and welcome, but Bernie and his cronies have gone nuts.
besides, if they want to screw with points there are better systems around.
My 2 cents
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 05:13:18
|
Quote
|
|
before we know the scoring system for last year, I thought the scoring system for the future was 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 06:23:17
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Luke Siong @ December 11th 2009,05:13:18 )
I thought the scoring system for the future was 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
That was never suggested by anybody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 06:25:16
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Timothy Lord @ December 10th 2009,21:13:50 )
And how long before we see a "suggestion" that this points system is used here in GPRO?
May as well just use the old CART scoring system that awarded points to 12 positions. This new scoring system seems stupid for F1 to use. If anything they should stop giving out points to people that are simply middle of the pack.
I would rather see F-1 go to the old 10-6-4-3-2-1 system than this silliness. They want to reward winning more? This doesnt do it, it rewards mediocrity with undeserved points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 06:32:40
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Frank Rizzo @ December 11th 2009,06:25:16 )
May as well just use the old CART scoring system that awarded points to 12 positions.
Yes...But i believe to NASCAR system :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 06:40:31 (viimeksi muokattu 11.12.2009, 06:41:46 Cale Murray toimesta)
|
Quote
|
this is how it would look on last years
Final Standings
1 - Jenson Button, 230.5
2 - Sebastian Vettel, -27.5
3 - Rubens Barrichello, -47.5
4 - Mark Webber, -55.5
5 - Lewis Hamilton, -110
6 - Kimi Räikkönen, -111.5
7 - Jarno Trulli, -152.5
8 - Nico Rosberg, -155
9 - Timo Glock, -167
10 - Fernando Alonso, -168.5
Half points because of the shortened race in Malaysia. Top six the same, little difference in when drivers are mathematically out the championship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 06:40:46
|
Quote
|
|
The thing is, this doesn't reward the winner any more than the other one. 10:8:6 = 25:20:15
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 06:41:39
|
Quote
|
Just pick something and keep it !!!!!
How often do other sports change their points systems?
Hey let's make the penalty kick in Soccer worth 1 point, a score from a corner or free kick 2 points, and a regular goal from general play 3 points LOL.. Stupid yes.
But we tolerate it in Motorsport(F1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 06:42:44
|
Quote
|
|
hey horst i am not a big soccer supporter but that would get my interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 07:16:16
|
Quote
|
|
I think this point system is a bit too much. They shud make it like 20, 15, 10, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2. 25 is too much. But i guess i am quite fine with or without it, so, yeah. They're done, so no matter how much you say, it's finalised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 08:13:10
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Frank Rizzo @ December 11th 2009,06:25:16 )
I would rather see F-1 go to the old 10-6-4-3-2-1 system than this silliness. They want to reward winning more? This doesnt do it, it rewards mediocrity with undeserved points.
This right here.
Probably been mentioned in the thread already, but I can't wait for all the new suggestion topics proposing this system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 10:23:15
|
Quote
|
You're all short-sighted... I'm pretty sure (since the proposal came from Bernie) the new system has nothing to do with sportive reasons...
Awarding points to more drivers will increase the visibility of the backrunners, because TV will now spread it's attention to the top-10 (or even more if there's a fight for 10th). This will increase sponsor interest in mediocre teams, hence increasing the money available in F1, hance feeding Bernie's wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 11:43:33
|
Quote
|
I finally had a chance to read this properly (the article) and to be honest this is just becoming more and more annoying, awarding points to the top 10 just makes it so much easier for teams to score points now, i missed the days of only points to the top 6 drivers, back when there was like 30 cars battling it out for those points, that made for some real racing right there.
Also this doesn't help bernie as he pays the teams for every point scored in the F1 championship. So he is just making it harder on himself.
We has the medals offer last season and i hated that too, the origional points gave the championship to consistancy, NOT WINS!
It doesn't matter if you win 1 race, as long as you stay consistant in the championship, thats a true derserving champion right there!
The back runners are meant to go gun-ho to get those points, as we saw with force india this season, they took advantage of the track downforce and scored points, it's about awarding stratagy.
I might sound like a moaning lil child, but i see the NASCAR, Indycar, Moto Gp and A1 scorings and they never make sense to me, F1 always had a sensible scoring of 10,6,4,3,2,1 and 10,8,6,5,4,3,2,1.
This is just getting out of hand, if there becomes more of this stupid antics with bernie i might just give up F1 in general. I always liked the battles in GP2 and F3 more. Qualifying is more interesting in F1.
F1- R.I.P 2009 we hardly knew ye
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 16:49:40
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Jordan Randall @ December 11th 2009,11:43:33 )
F1- R.I.P 2009 we hardly knew ye
Now it's official..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 16:57:57
|
Quote
|
|
The new points system it is absolutley great.. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:14:59
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Mikko Suhonen @ December 10th 2009,21:12:11 )
If this gets through, we can say goodbye to trying to rank different era drivers by who has the most points of all time.
Although it is already a bit tough to compare even now...
Goodbye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:22:30
|
Quote
|
|
Gpro, for all sanity in the word PLEASE keep the point system the same! :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:24:05
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Jordan Randall @ December 11th 2009,17:22:30 )
Gpro, for all sanity in the word PLEASE keep the point system the same! :/
+1 :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:26:19
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Jordan Randall @ December 11th 2009,17:22:30 )
PLEASE keep the point system the same!
Yeah, probably GPRO Admins will have taken a very hard decision. ideally will be put to the vote, but vote to be held by Stefan
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:26:34
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Jordan Randall @ December 11th 2009,17:22:30 )
Gpro, for all sanity in the word PLEASE keep the point system the same! :/
If they did change it ,it would help consistent manager's rather than the 'one big push' ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:28:17
|
Quote
|
|
If it would approve the new system is likely to reach 1,000,000 Jari :D :P
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jed Lilly @ December 11th 2009,17:26:34 )
If they did change it ,it would help consistent manager's rather than the 'one big push' ones. You are meant to push though, thats the exitement of earning those points, for giving it your all, you cant just get them because you took it easy!
Its just going to make life so much easier for drivers :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:30:45
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Jordan Randall @ December 11th 2009,17:29:24 )
you cant just get them because you took it easy!
That's really true.. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:34:29
|
Quote
|
8-6-5-3
If you ask to me 8-6-4-3 would be more logical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:36:31
|
Quote
|
GPRO is only based on open wheeled racing it is not a carbon copy.. I have lost count the amount of times i have seen these things in the forums.. Just cos it will effect F1 does not mean it will effect GPRO why should it?
I like the idea of making the drivers go for it more and having a bigger difference between positions.
|
|
|
|
|
I think maybe 15-12-10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 should be a considered way. This new proposed scheme of 25 for a winner is too much, and some records will be more easily broken. On the other hand, Michael Schumacher wouldn't hold most of the records anymore...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:38:12
|
Quote
|
|
bad....its getting like The "Andrex Premiere league" it wont be long before you dont relegate you get in Europa League, F1 will be soon finish and have a point
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 lähetetty 11.12.2009, 17:45:49
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Lee Parfitt @ December 11th 2009,17:38:12 )
F1 will be soon finish and have a point
Really based on what Lee?
It should make the show better not worse cant you see that?
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
