Author |
Topic: [Mafia] - Game of GPRO [GAME OVER] |
5922 replies
|
|
Janne, Jack, Kras, Marvin
Wanna join the funsies?
|
|
|
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,20:34:22 ) It is psychology.
And I'm sad that you said these words.
Please go and read some past games. Please realise the ones who like to emphasise "I am town" are more often scum than a random sample would be. That's psychology. The uncocious need to push the fact you are town to the group is a scum tell.
|
|
|
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,20:36:21 ) <!-- gpro_300x250 --> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Janne, Jack, Kras, Marvin
Wanna join the funsies?
If by "funsies" you mean your wagon, I'm already there.
|
|
|
Quote ( Jack Benson @ November 17th 2014,20:35:18 ) Before someone takes my above post seriously I'll just disclaim by saying it was a joke.
Quickly getting that in there before a lie detector tests your claim to see if you're really a lie detector? :p
|
|
|
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,20:36:21 ) Janne, Jack, Kras, Marvin
Wanna join the funsies?
Sure!
I am town-aligned.
You are scum, though.
Andi's claim makes too much sense, whereas you pretty much stopped making sense somewhere during your little awol.
Also Vlad, honey - really liked your bragging about how your thoughts were always right....well, remind me how many scum you have found, and then remind me who can always tell if a town player is town :)
##unvote Kevin ##vote Vladimir
btw...should Vladimir flip Alexandrov, we definitely need to take a closer look at Finn, too. 2191 and 2195 seem a coincidence caused by QT speculation
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,20:27:40 ) I am town.
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,20:36:31 ) Please realise the ones who like to emphasise "I am town" are more often scum than a random sample would be. I knew it! :P
|
|
|
Kevin, can you give us all a vote count?
I really wouldn't want to get lynched asleep -)
|
|
|
Quote ( Janne Väänänen @ November 17th 2014,20:43:39 ) btw...should Vladimir flip Alexandrov, we definitely need to take a closer look at Finn, too. 2191 and 2195 seem a coincidence caused by QT speculation Please expand, I'm obviously not seeing what you're seeing
|
|
|
evening, sorry.... sicky offspring taken up my afternoon!
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 17th 2014,02:07:26 ) I will not be supporting Vladimir's lynch because in my opinion his play since the negining of the game seems reasonable and the comments he posts are spot on.
Me either, at this point.
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,09:36:51 ) Strongly disagree with Daniel being on it. Same here, at this point.
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,10:25:46 ) Also, regarding Kirsty, her being targeted again means nothing and, as you mentioned, there is the possibility that the vote thief action is still from the previous night and remains "stolen", so she may not have been targeted action gain any way. The PM stated 'once again, you cannot vote' I think the fact it says it as once again, not continued or something similar, and the fact that on the first PM it said specifically on Day 2.
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,17:14:53 ) Have you read my posts at all? To be honest, I would like you to say clearly what you opinion of Vlads alignment is and reasons as well. I know you say its in thread, but would be nice to see it clearly.
Up to 2330 so far
|
|
|
Official Vote Count #3.1(up to Post #2409)
Andi - 0 () Chew - 0 () Daniel - 0 () Daryl - 0 () Finn - 1 (Jimmy) Francois - 0 () Jack - 0 () Janne - 0 () Jimmy - 0 () Kevin - 1 (Krasimir) Kirsty - 1 (Unknown) Krasimir - 1 (Vladimir) Marvin - 0 () Michał - 0 () Mike - 0 () Mikko - 0 () Noel - 0 () Shoaib - 0 () Vladimir - 6 (Jack, Andi, Noel, Finn, Kevin, Janne) No Lynch - 0 ()
Still to vote - Chew, Daniel, Daryl, Francois, Marvin, Michał, Mike, Mikko, Shoaib
With 19 Players alive, it will normally take 10 votes to reach Instalynch. You must have a vote in place at the deadline if Instalynch is not reached.
The current deadline is Friday, 21st of November 2014 at 22:00:00 CET
|
|
|
I thought Shoaib had replaced Nicholas.
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,19:22:29 ) And your scenarios miss out the possibility that the hated townie is actually scum playing us, And yet you were tyhe one going on about him being almost confirmed, Daniel said it a few times too. No mention of that possibility of him lying back then.
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 10th 2014,12:08:07 ) As basically a confirmed townie - I can't see scum asking for the lynch
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 10th 2014,19:51:56 ) Why? My reason is that he's almost confirmed town with that claim. What's your reason?
Quote ( Janne Väänänen @ November 17th 2014,20:43:39 ) Andi's claim makes too much sense I agree, but I immediately thought it was a TP or scum role.
Quote ( Tim-Oliver Wagner @ November 17th 2014,21:35:45 ) Kirsty - 1 (Unknown)
Seriously, still?
|
|
|
Quote ( Kirsty Ridley @ November 17th 2014,21:46:13 ) And yet you were tyhe one going on about him being almost confirmed, Daniel said it a few times too. No mention of that possibility of him lying back then. Daniel says whatever Kevin says. One other player called him more than "almost" confirmed. Why not mention Vlad?
|
|
|
Almost confirmed is not 100%, is it? Given the scenarios presented about it being correct or not for a town vig to shoot him are close (unless vig hits scum instead) that bit of uncertainty is significant.
I still believe he's almost confirmed but I wouldn't say 100%, more so now with recruitment in play (but I would say it's unlikely Stuart would have recruited him).
|
|
|
Quote ( Mikko Harju @ November 17th 2014,21:45:40 ) I thought Shoaib had replaced Nicholas.
That's what happens when lazy mod is copy-pasting.
|
|
|
|
I feel the need, the need to read :)
|
|
|
Apologies in advance if I'm going over old ground as am starting from beginning of day again but does the flavour of Stuart's death i.e. hacked possibly indicate the method of kill?
|
|
|
It's the same flavour that "killed" Mr Shadow in the opening flavour.
|
|
|
^^^^^ I knew I'd read it somewhere before. Thanks Kevin
--------
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 17th 2014,00:31:41 ) And, why did you think Mafia didn't nightkill you?
If not already answered Finn this is still a valid question.
--------
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,01:13:53 ) Because so far my opinions have been spot on.
To you yes of course they would be. To everybody else perhaps not.
|
|
|
Quote ( Mike Baston @ November 17th 2014,23:13:54 ) If not already answered Finn this is still a valid question. I somehow completely missed that, he must have done it while I was writing. I'll answer it now
|
|
|
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 17th 2014,00:31:41 ) And, why did you think Mafia didn't nightkill you? Kevin said they wouldn't didn't he? maybe that's your answer
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 17th 2014,00:31:41 ) Finn, since you claim to be a role blocker, who did you block last night? guess
|
|
|
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,19:48:01 ) If he is town he should clearly claim it, right? Or, rather, should have. He had no reason not to, unless he is third party or scum. This gets me to another point, btw.
Nonsense
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,10:35:57 ) On an unrelated note: Do you think that DA message could have been an announcement of someone's Bulletproof wearing off?
I believe that this was really just a guess
@Tim: Shouldn't Stuart be removed from the votecount?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Marvin Mackenberg @ November 17th 2014,23:18:10 ) I believe that this was really just a guess
Doesn't mean that his play isn't scummy as hell
##vote Vladimir
|
|
|
Marvin, what's scummy about Vladimir's play?
|
|
|
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 17th 2014,02:07:26 ) I will not be supporting Vladimir's lynch because in my opinion his play since the negining of the game seems reasonable and the comments he posts are spot on.
In amongst everything else I've read so far this is a bit out of left field. Am hoping to find something more to explain this comment/view/opinion as I continue.
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,07:35:03 ) Saying that, Michal seems confident that you are town and I'm gonna trust his judgement for now.
Any reason why you so readily trust Michal's judgement Kevin?
--------
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 17th 2014,09:34:32 ) 2)You are a blocker, and hence you know Eduardo was blocked.
I'm sorry, can the rest see any other reasons how Finn might know that Eduardo was blocked???
Just for clarity, define 'blocked' for me Chew?
|
|
|
Gotta go do other silly games on here a mo now so back soon.
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,17:14:53 ) Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 17th 2014,17:10:08 )
Kevin a question to ask you:
Given that Vlad has attacked you on both Day 2 and today, what are your thoughts towards his behaviour? What alignment do you see him as?
Have you read my posts at all?
Yes Kevin I have. I just can't seem to make out what you think about him. At some points you seem to be quite convinced he is scum, at others, you don't seem to be entirely convinced like when you withdrew your vote after Michal's defence of Vlad.
|
|
|
But whatever asked above has changed after what happened while I was sleeping...
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,20:32:27 ) Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 17th 2014,20:30:03 )
What we going to do if everyone says it? Maybe that means there are no scum?
Of course not. But surely there will be someone who will be all like "it's dumb, why do we have to do this, this is nonsence" before finally making a claim. I bet that even after I posted this, someone will say so.
Vlad, you do know that whether someone claims town or whether he says "Its dumb" won't tell us much at all? In fact, I will go much as to say that probably someone who calls it dumb has a higher chance of being town than one who jumps straight and claim "I am town"
It doesn't make sense
Quote ( Vladimir Tsuverkalov @ November 17th 2014,19:48:01 ) Quote ( Janne Väänänen @ November 17th 2014,19:44:28 )
Yes because Andi will claim anti-town like a boss.
If he is town he should clearly claim it, right? Or, rather, should have. He had no reason not to, unless he is third party or scum. This gets me to another point, btw.
Deathproof is possible standalone as well as a modifier, right?
Based on this why are you not claiming then? Does that imply that you are scum?
##Vote Vladimir
|
|
|
Krasimir, is it you who control Kirsty vote?
|
|
|
Re Mike's #2424:
"Blocked" would mean that a person's night action is unable to be done.
|
|