| Author |
Topic: [Mafia] - Game of GPRO [GAME OVER] |
5922 replies
|
|
|
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 28th 2014,20:54:53 ) I'd prefer Janne lynch over Kevin today...
then
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 28th 2014,21:43:19 ) Quote ( Daryl Gee @ November 28th 2014,21:29:46 )
Ah. So I'd be wasting my time asking you your reasons for voting Janne then.
Weak, unbelieveable claim, not enough supporters of Kevin lynch
You claim to prefer a Janne lynch but then give one of your reasons for voting him as not enough support for my lynch.
And, trust it or not, I don't see what is "unbelievable" about Janne's claim.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 28th 2014,21:09:13 ) Yes, it is
Since when did Janne have m's in it?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jack Benson @ November 29th 2014,00:07:14 ) Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 28th 2014,21:09:13 )
Yes, it is
Since when did Janne have m's in it?
It doesn't. Since when does a vote or unvote become invalid due to a spelling error or typo if it is clear who you meant? (I wrote the rule :p)
|
|
|
|
Since Janne claimed he was unable to kill Noel as a vig, we are unable to tell here whether he is lying or not. I was just wondering if we should be looking to see if anyone is gonna counter Janne by claiming they killed Stuart instead?
Also, should we be looking into a claim by a redirectioner or blocker which stopped the N3 kill by Janne? It's a risky move though because it reveals a lot of the town roles, but it does help to some extent in seeing if Janne is telling the truth or lying.
Wanting to hear the advice of others whether this should be done, considering the high risk by doing such an action of having multiple town claiming.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 29th 2014,00:42:11 ) I was just wondering if we should be looking to see if anyone is gonna counter Janne by claiming they killed Stuart instead?
Why would he fake claim that he killed someone? he'd be instantly counter-claimed
|
|
|
|
Point noted Finn.
But if we are following what you are saying and noting the kill flavours for Stuart's death, we can say that Janne is town?
|
|
|
|
|
Well Janne basically claimed third party
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ November 29th 2014,00:51:48 ) Well Janne basically claimed third party
How?
See #4231
|
|
|
|
|
he has claimed the owner of an external site - how is that not third party?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ November 29th 2014,01:07:41 ) he has claimed the owner of an external site - how is that not third party?
It's not enough to decide whether he is TP or not. The third party could also possible be people in this site of all you know!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes but I can't see how that can be town. It clearly suggests a third party role as it's someone who has never played GPRO
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 28th 2014,21:04:32 ) Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 28th 2014,20:59:34 )
You could have saved yourself Michal.
What am I titanic? I'm still alive and there are chances I will be on the next day too
Your confidence is worrying Michal. Is there anything you are hiding from us?
|
|
|
|
Does anyone else notice that Michal is pushing so hard for a Daryl and Janne lynch, even though it seems that Daryl is possible town? Janne maybe a slight chance to be scum but it's hard to dispute his claim due to no one actually stating that they killed Stuart.
Add that to what I have observed earlier from his play in the first few days and Michal gives me a scummy vibe.
|
|
|
|
Official Vote Count #4.8(up to Post #4272)
Chew - 1 (Unknown)
Daniel - 0 ()
Daryl - 0 ()
Finn - 0 ()
Gareth - 0 ()
Jack - 0 ()
Janne - 4 (Gareth, Shoaib, Jack, Marvin)
Kevin - 3 (Kirsty, Michał, Daryl)
Kirsty - 1 (Mike)
Krasimir - 0 ()
Marvin - 0 ()
Michał - 4 (Chew, Krasimir, Janne, Paul)
Mike - 0 ()
Paul - 0 ()
Shoaib - 0 ()
No Lynch - 0 ()
Still to vote - Daniel, Kevin
With 15 Players alive, it will normally take 8 votes to reach Instalynch. You must have a vote in place at the deadline if Instalynch is not reached.
The current deadline is Sunday, 30th of November 2014 at 18:00:00 CET
|
|
|
|
oops
##unvote Kevin
##vote Janne
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 29th 2014,01:47:31 ) Does anyone else notice that Michal is pushing so hard for a Daryl and Janne lynch, even though it seems that Daryl is possible town? Janne maybe a slight chance to be scum but it's hard to dispute his claim due to no one actually stating that they killed Stuart.
No idea what are you smoking but I didnt talk about Daryl after his claim.
And I'm not pushing anything
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 29th 2014,03:54:11 ) Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 29th 2014,01:47:31 )
Does anyone else notice that Michal is pushing so hard for a Daryl and Janne lynch, even though it seems that Daryl is possible town? Janne maybe a slight chance to be scum but it's hard to dispute his claim due to no one actually stating that they killed Stuart.
No idea what are you smoking but I didnt talk about Daryl after his claim.
And I'm not pushing anything
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 28th 2014,18:37:08 ) Quote ( Janne Väänänen @ November 28th 2014,17:38:30 )
btw should I get lynched today i'll just share that Daryl is (most likely) town from what I have gathered from his recent posts, no time to explain now
Janne Daryl both mafia?
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 28th 2014,18:44:23 ) I can't see any town action behind Daryl's killing of Noel.
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 28th 2014,19:07:45 ) I took a closer look to Daryl's posts and they were all weird and vague... Post restriction, but couldn't find a pattern
Yes you didn't talk about pushing for a Daryl lynch after his claim, but you did talk quite a bit after his possible vig kill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 29th 2014,00:42:11 ) or blocker which stopped the N3 kill by Janne?
Since I didnt receive a PM confirming I got blocked, it can't have been a roleblocker.
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ November 29th 2014,01:20:18 ) Yes but I can't see how that can be town. It clearly suggests a third party role as it's someone who has never played GPRO
Ask Tim-O about that. And Sanchez did have a GPRO account anyway.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Janne Väänänen @ November 29th 2014,13:32:34 ) And Sanchez did have a GPRO account anyway.
oh right I didn't know that
|
|
|
|
Janne, how do you know that you would receive a PM if you were blocked? As you are claiming a kill action there is no reason for you to be told normally. Finn says you would with his role but you don't know if that applies to any other roleblocker.
We have action faith healer dead, a claimed JOAT with protection ability that didn't target Noel and he was the doc so you can safely assume he couldn't protect himself. With the Webster claim too, are we really suggesting yet another protection role out there? And choose to protect Noel?
So if protection didn't save him, then that only leaves blocking and it wasn't Finn.
More likely that you are lying about attempting to kill Noel that you did attempt it but something prevented it.
|
|
|
|
|
Stupid predictive text. Action = a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ November 26th 2014,02:15:06 ) no I was right at first, anybody with a night action where they need to target somebody else will be informed that they have been blocked, not just cops/killing roles/doctor. Jack is lying and is scum.
Because I assumed all blocking would work similarly in a mafia game? Thought it was weird but as nobody countered it at that point I assumed this was true
|
|
|
|
It well could work the same way, but not definite as it's related to the flavour of the role (with a standard roleblocker, the person would not be told their action failed but only receive a "no result" type response if their ability required a response).
But if you weren't blocked, what explains Noel not being dead? Unless you are lying?
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I've been wondering. Since I know I definitely am not lying.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 29th 2014,06:32:25 ) Yes you didn't talk about pushing for a Daryl lynch after his claim, but you did talk quite a bit after his possible vig kill.
Why shouldn't I be talking about Daryl being mafia after his vig/mafia day kill?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 29th 2014,06:32:25 ) Yes you didn't talk about pushing for a Daryl lynch after his claim, but you did talk quite a bit after his possible vig kill.
The fact you saying it was a vig kill is implied knowledge and its noted had Janne flipped town vig
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ November 29th 2014,17:36:47 ) The fact you saying it was a vig kill is implied knowledge Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ November 29th 2014,06:32:25 ) after his possible vig kill.
Chew may or may not have knowledge, but he certainly hasn't shown any implied knowledge here.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ November 29th 2014,17:47:05 ) Chew may or may not have knowledge, but he certainly hasn't shown any implied knowledge here.
Use of the word vig was unneccessary and shows that Chew knows or wants us to think it was a vig kill...
|
|
|
|
What a lot of shit. It looks like a vig kill. It is claimed to be a vig kill. And Chew has some ulterior motive for saying vig?
What you might want to question Chew for is the consistency of his argument as he's criticised you questioning Daryl but others have and it was before the claim that made Daryl look pretty townie, so you had every right to doubt Daryl.
Also, questioning your motives for wanting Janne lynched given the general opinion of Janne and him being the other lynch candidate are a bit pathetic too.
|
|
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
