Author |
Topic: [Mafia] - Game of GPRO [GAME OVER] |
5922 replies
|
|
Quote ( Marvin Mackenberg @ December 9th 2014,17:44:41 ) Daniel stands out a lot more. He is very vocal and always says what he thinks, even if he knows that it creates controversy. Sometimes I think it's exactly what he wants.
Isn't that his play all the time though? Including as town?
You mentioned you thought Daryl's day kill was town motivated. What of Daniel's vote taking?
|
|
|
##Unvote No Lynch
Actually Now that I've thought about it how does it prove Marvin's claim could he be scum with the same ability? if so then that plan would just play into scum hands. I will have to think it through a little more.
|
|
|
Quote ( Paul Williams @ December 9th 2014,19:27:06 ) Actually Now that I've thought about it how does it prove Marvin's claim could he be scum with the same ability? if so then that plan would just play into scum hands. I will have to think it through a little more.
Because the ability pretty much proves his character as Gordon Ashford (you'll need to trust us on that one, it's a few have said it), due to his hatred for no lynches and past roles regarding them. Gordon isn't an admin so, we assume, isn't mafia.
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ December 9th 2014,19:29:08 ) assume
You should never 'Assume'
It makes an Ass out of U and Me!
I'm not saying no I'm just unsure if it will prove anything, how experienced is Marvin at this? could he have thought up this himself (or his buddies if he is mafia) to confuse us?
|
|
|
Quote ( Paul Williams @ December 9th 2014,19:32:05 ) You should never 'Assume'
Feel free to read the thread, which covers my opinion on that - it was me that questioned if it cleared Marvin or not.
Quote ( Paul Williams @ December 9th 2014,19:32:05 ) I'm not saying no I'm just unsure if it will prove anything, how experienced is Marvin at this? could he have thought up this himself (or his buddies if he is mafia) to confuse us?
Have you read the thread at all? This is all discussed already.
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ December 9th 2014,19:34:16 ) Have you read the thread at all? This is all discussed already.
Yes I did read the thread but I did However appear to miss some important posts,(I Blame my internet dropping out on me) so that does clear a few things up for me so yeah I'm game for it I will put my vote in after we get an answer on this if we get one at all.
Quote ( Marvin Mackenberg @ December 9th 2014,16:47:50 ) I will confirm with Tim whether it really is a twilight action.
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ December 9th 2014,19:29:08 ) Because the ability pretty much proves his character as Gordon Ashford (you'll need to trust us on that one, it's a few have said it), due to his hatred for no lynches and past roles regarding them. Gordon isn't an admin so, we assume, isn't mafia. It certainly wouldn't make sense as a Chris Williams role.
Can't quite get my head around whether it makes more sense as a town role or a scum role - getting a town decided lynch anyway if town can't get their act together enough to get a lynch doesn't seem that logical as a "punishment", but given how restricted the potential targets would be, it probably doesn't matter that much.
I just don't really buy it as a role.
|
|
|
Quote ( Marvin Mackenberg @ December 9th 2014,17:17:48 ) My other choice would be Daniel by process of elimination. I don't see the others as being mafia. Why not Kevin? We "know" he's TP.
|
|
|
Quote ( Marvin Mackenberg @ December 9th 2014,17:44:41 ) . He is very vocal and always says what he thinks, even if he knows that it creates controversy.
lmao
That is ridiculous.
Marvin: Someone being vocal and saying what they think is EXACTLY what that player should be doing if they are town. It is scum which cannot say what they think.
Maybe next game I will pick up lying and holding back my thoughts, would that be a town tell for you?
Moron.
|
|
|
|
|
So are we sure the alignment of a no lynch enforcer is town. Almost seems a lynch opportunity goes begging to prove the point.
I think we have the numbers to try but if this is a night action how do we know the difference
Makes me uneasy
|
|
|
Quote ( Gareth Griffiths @ December 9th 2014,22:32:30 ) So are we sure the alignment of a no lynch enforcer is town. Almost seems a lynch opportunity goes begging to prove the point.
I think we have the numbers to try but if this is a night action how do we know the difference
Makes me uneasy
Read the last 10 to 15 posts.
|
|
|
Gotcha. Missed one vital post. Still unsure but will go with the consensus
|
|
|
Quote ( Marvin Mackenberg @ December 9th 2014,16:47:50 ) My role pm states that I can lynch a player, I will confirm with Tim whether it really is a twilight action. Testing my claim with a no lynch is ok for me.
Any clarification on this?
|
|
|
##Unvote Daryl
##Vote Marvin
He's had plenty time to confirm this. If he does, I'll move my vote to "no lynch". If he doesn't or says it doesn't happen before the night, so indistinguishable from a night kill, then I'm happy to leave my vote where it is as I would then be confident he is lying with his claim.
|
|
|
|
My kill happens before the night.
|
|
|
Quote ( Daniel Douglas @ December 9th 2014,20:11:50 ) lmao
That is ridiculous.
Marvin: Someone being vocal and saying what they think is EXACTLY what that player should be doing if they are town. It is scum which cannot say what they think.
Maybe next game I will pick up lying and holding back my thoughts, would that be a town tell for you?
Moron.
Maybe, but really just maybe it could be the case that you are too stupid to understand what I said. If you look at my past posts about you in this game (not that many. You don't have to read much), you'll realise that the way you understood my post would contradict something I said about you earlier.
Kevin asked more than one question and I answered more than one question.
|
|
|
##Unvote Marvin
##Vote No Lynch
|
|
|
Paul, get your no lynch vote on please.
|
|
|
##unvote marvin ##vote no lynch
x2
|
|
|
Hm,
I will wait to put unknown on it, so that it isnt L1
Paul needs be on the no lynch
|
|
|
Quote ( Daniel Douglas @ December 10th 2014,12:28:46 ) Hm,
I will wait to put unknown on it, so that it isnt L1
Paul needs be on the no lynch
Was just about to say! lol
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ December 10th 2014,12:29:23 ) Quote ( Daniel Douglas @ December 10th 2014,12:28:46 )
Hm,
I will wait to put unknown on it, so that it isnt L1
Paul needs be on the no lynch
Was just about to say! lol
I always review to make sure i hadnt missed a vote before i send pm.... i had forgotten about shoaibs.
|
|
|
Interesting responses from Jack and Mike to the case I made on day 2 against Marvin...
|
|
|
|
|
So, if Marvin can kill Paul, then Marvin is pretty much cleared. If not, it's probably buggered?
|
|
|
And now Paul needs to vote so Marvin can kill him, so no one else should be voting no lynch now.
|
|
|
Official Vote Count #7.1(up to Post #5186)
Daniel - 0 () Daryl - 0 () Gareth - 0 () Kevin - 0 () Kirsty - 1 (Gareth) Krasimir - 0 () Marvin - 3 (Krasimir, Unknown, Daryl) Paul - 0 () Shoaib - 0 () No Lynch - 3 (Shoaib, Kevin, Daniel)
Still to vote - Kirsty, Paul
With 9 Players alive, it will normally take 5 votes to reach Instalynch. You must have a vote in place at the deadline if Instalynch is not reached.
The current deadline is Thursday, 11th of December 2014 at 23:00:00 CET
|
|
|
Quote ( Daryl Gee @ December 10th 2014,13:05:26 ) Interesting responses from Jack and Mike to the case I made on day 2 against Marvin...
Interesting response from Daryl to allowing Marvin to prove his role and kill Paul. :)
Feel free to point out the responses from Jack and Mike as, in all honesty, I can't be bothered searching for them as quite busy with other things right now. Curious to see how they look like defending a buddy over buddying up with a townie or defending someone they know will flip town.
Even if correct, the percentage play is still to test Marvin today and deal with him tomorrow if need be, IMO.
|
|
|
Ok then here it is ## vote no lynch
|
|