Page « 1 2 3 ... 7 [89 ... 22 23 24 » Quick go to page:
Author Topic: Is this cheating? 705 replies
Pedro Almeida
(Group Pro - 13)


Posts: 5000
  Country:
Portugal 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #211 posted Sep 10th 2011, 00:50:21 Quote 
Quote ( Marco Predappio @ September 10th 2011,00:39:49 )

I promoted to pro with a lvl 4 car, driver is important.


In the end, management is what is all about...

I would a lot worried to fall in rookie these wild days down there, uffffffff....
Alan Horsley
(Group Amateur - 22)



Posts: 2084
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (15)   Dislike this post (10)
Old post #212 posted Sep 20th 2012, 08:36:28 Quote 
I’ve been putting some thought into the issue of Practice sessions.
We know some people have tools which eliminate the need for practice laps (giving them a season saving of up to $6.8 mil over someone who does do practice laps) and, yes, I understand that elites etc have sufficient data to apparently negate the need so no need to point that out again.

I’m sufficiently experienced and active enough that I’m sure I could join a team that uses this tool but I choose to stay where I am because my teammates are fun guys but also because I want to get as much enjoyment out of the game as possible. I enjoy using the practice session to get a ‘good’ setup and try different splits/tyres etc but am having to find that I am having to keep my practice laps to an absolute minimum just to try to compete financially with the tool users.

Would race teams in the real world skip a practice session to save money? Seems unlikely to me.

I would like to make a couple of suggestions and see what other people think:

Suggestion 1
Free practice sessions
Probably not realistic as a simulation of the real world but would allow all players the chance to utilise the practice session without losing out to the tools (my nickname for tool users ;)

Suggestion 2
A fixed charge for the practice session for any manager who choses to participate in the ‘race weekend’ regardless of whether they chose to do no laps. 1 lap etc. This would probably be more in keeping with real racing and shouldn’t require much tweaking of the game code I doubt.
Roland Postle10
(Group Rookie - 172)



Posts: 1855
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (18)   Dislike this post (2)
Old post #213 posted Sep 20th 2012, 08:59:26 Quote 
How about introducing a secondary advantage to doing practise sessions: Either a small test points gain, or a very small increase in driver attributes (experience and/or TI maybe), or something else along those lines. Perhaps a temporary CCP boost for that race only

That way all the work people have put into predicting setups would still give them the advantage of a strategic choice of saving $400,000 when finances are tight but would have to be weighed against losing out on a little wear-free testing, instead of the no-brainer decision it is now
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (6)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #214 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:06:08 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 09:14:33 by Ivan Salfa) Quote 
6 and 7 mil is a significant ammount of advantage gained indeed for those 'black market ad-ons'.

Sugestion 2 is sound and deals the money aspect of this 'problem'. from the root.

Edit: A temporary (race only) experiance/motivation gain, is also sound.
More practice= more confidence, more experiance, more race weekend competence. (regardless of tool or not)
Michał Kożuchowski
(Group Pro - 11)



Posts: 2451
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (9)
Old post #215 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:06:20 Quote 
Quote ( Roland Postle @ September 20th 2012,08:59:26 )

How about introducing a secondary advantage to doing practise sessions: Either a small test points gain, or a very small increase in driver attributes (experience and/or TI maybe), or something else along those lines. Perhaps a temporary CCP boost for that race only

That way all the work people have put into predicting setups would still give them the advantage of a strategic choice of saving $400,000 when finances are tight but would have to be weighed against losing out on a little wear-free testing, instead of the no-brainer decision it is now


if this would give you TI I won't do ANY practice laps... TI is just taking OA and is not useful...
Bad idea for me, it's 8 PL you may do less you can't do more... Many of us have correct setup without any PL so why should we do 8 of them? And why should this give benefits to people who do 8?
Marius Ruţa
(Group Pro - 7)



Posts: 8138
  Country:
Romania 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (2)
Old post #216 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:07:56 Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,08:36:28 )

We know some people have tools which eliminate the need for practice laps

Would you trust a tool that much that you won`t do any practice laps at all? I wouldn`t.
Jose Devassy
(Group Amateur - 60)



Posts: 791
  Country:
India 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #217 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:11:00 Quote 
That sounds nice Roland..
Daneks Britāls
(Group Master - 2)



Posts: 14044
  Country:
Latvia 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #218 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:11:55 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 09:12:33 by Daneks Britāls) Quote 
Quote ( Marius Ruţa @ September 20th 2012,09:07:56 )

Would you trust a tool that much that you won`t do any practice laps at all? I wouldn`t.


This. Tools is not advantage to users of them. This is their problem
Mark Webster
(Group Elite)



Posts: 10727
  Country:
Scotland 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #219 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:14:58 Quote 
All that's true, but if all you need to do is 1 practice lap to confirm it's acceptability as opposed to 8, that's still a good $6m+ saving a season.
Alan Horsley
(Group Amateur - 22)



Posts: 2084
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #220 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:15:16 Quote 
Quote ( Marius Ruţa @ September 20th 2012,09:07:56 )

Would you trust a tool that much that you won`t do any practice laps at all? I wouldn`t.


I have been told by an 'inside source' that one such tool is guaranteed to get within 4 pts of a 'certain' setup, so yes, i would trust this tool but i would choose not to use it out of principal.

Quote ( Roland Postle @ September 20th 2012,08:59:26 )

How about introducing a secondary advantage to doing practise sessions: Either a small test points gain, or a very small increase in driver attributes (experience and/or TI maybe), or something else along those lines. Perhaps a temporary CCP boost for that race only


All sound good except TI for reasons mentioned by Michal.

Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ September 20th 2012,09:06:20 )

why should this give benefits to people who do 8?


You don't think a racing team would benefit from running a practice session against a team who didn't bother showing up? ;)
Michał Kożuchowski
(Group Pro - 11)



Posts: 2451
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (4)
Old post #221 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:21:32 Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:15:16 )

You don't think a racing team would benefit from running a practice session against a team who didn't bother showing up? ;)


Practice laps in real life too are to measure Fuel, Tyre Consumption and setup of the car. If a team has correct data, and can setup, fuel and choose strategy without doing any practice laps, just good for them...
Same here, if you do have setup fuel and tyres without testing, it's just your advantage...
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #222 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:23:50 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 09:25:51 by Ivan Salfa) Quote 
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ September 20th 2012,09:06:20 )

Many of us have correct setup without any PL


Tracks change behaiviour acording to conditions. Sometimes even within 3 minutes, a track can change behaiviour and thus require a whole different set up.
Use your 'set up' another day, and you are finished.

I give you that you can have a 50% advantage if you 'know the track'. no more.
edit:(and then again, the driver needs to get out there and confirm/adjust.)
Michał Kożuchowski
(Group Pro - 11)



Posts: 2451
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #223 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:25:13 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 09:25:39 by Michał Kożuchowski) Quote 
Quote ( Ivan Salfa @ September 20th 2012,09:23:50 )

Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ September 20th 2012,09:06:20 )

Many of us have correct setup without any PL

Tracks change behaiviour acording to conditions. Sometimes even within 3 minutes, a track can change behaiviour and thus require a whole different set up.
Use your 'set up' another day, and you are finished.

I give you that you can have a 50% advantage if you 'know the track'. no more.


I change my setup here too, no matter what conditions on the track are...

BTW - Seems I have Haters L0L ;D
Greg Swaney
(Group Pro - 16)



Posts: 4344
  Country:
United States 
Certified: 
Like this post (2)   Dislike this post (2)
Old post #224 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:25:59 Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:15:16 )

i would trust this tool but i would choose not to use it out of principal.

And that is your choice. This is still a management game and if you feel that your "principle" way is good for you, then by all means stop worrying about what other teams may or may not have and use.
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #225 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:26:55 Quote 
Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ September 20th 2012,09:25:13 )

Seems I have Haters


No haters. Just discussing. Diferent oppinions exist even between the best of friends ;)
Michał Kożuchowski
(Group Pro - 11)



Posts: 2451
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #226 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:31:11 Quote 
Quote ( Ivan Salfa @ September 20th 2012,09:26:55 )

Quote ( Michał Kożuchowski @ September 20th 2012,09:25:13 )

Seems I have Haters

No haters. Just discussing. Diferent oppinions exist even between the best of friends ;)


I mean someone is Thubing Down all my posts ;) Not our gentleman discussion ;)
Alan Horsley
(Group Amateur - 22)



Posts: 2084
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #227 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:35:23 Quote 
I have been asked if i feel the game has been hacked to create these tools. Just wanted to confirm that i do not and that i know the tools have been created using seasons of race data.

There could still be advantages of using the tool even without the financial one such as more free laps to test splits etc so those who have been in the game longer and have more data could still gain some benefit.

I would just like not to be punished for wanting to do things properly.
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #228 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:35:26 Quote 
Going to race having done 1 practice lap is just apsurd, or you are Minardi :)
Michał Kożuchowski
(Group Pro - 11)



Posts: 2451
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #229 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:36:56 Quote 
Quote ( Ivan Salfa @ September 20th 2012,09:35:26 )

Going to race having done 1 practice lap is just apsurd, or you are Minardi :)


I may not do any of them but usually I do 1 for being sure, and than 2-3 more to make wingsplit better...
Janne Väänänen
(Group Master - 2)


Posts: 4888
  Country:
Finland 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #230 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:38:12 Quote 
Quote ( Ivan Salfa @ September 20th 2012,09:35:26 )

Going to race having done 1 practice lap is just apsurd, or you are Minardi :)


well, real F1 teams already know their setup when entering a new track, so no teams would probably make more than just 3-4 practise laps if they didn't get info from tyres, etc....and we don't get that in gpro =)
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #231 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:45:50 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 09:55:02 by Ivan Salfa) Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:35:23 )

I would just like not to be punished for wanting to do things properly.


Having tools is proper. If you choose to use them or not is your choice.
Game has 'evolved' and set up tech is available as it is normal.

The point you made initialy is sound though to deal with the economic injustice this brings. (No official GPRO practice tool is available)
A one time fee for entering practice (1 lap or 8) deals with it.

Race only driver gains gained by practice laps was also a good idea.

Edit: A briliant idea actualy!!
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #232 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:47:40 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 09:51:17 by Ivan Salfa) Quote 
Quote ( Janne Väänänen @ September 20th 2012,09:38:12 )

so no teams would probably make more than just 3-4 practise laps


Show me a serious team, in the entire open-cocpit world, that has done that and won.
Alan Horsley
(Group Amateur - 22)



Posts: 2084
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #233 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:49:47 Quote 
Quote ( Ivan Salfa @ September 20th 2012,09:45:50 )

Having tools is proper. If you hoose to use them or not is your choice.


I'm not objecting to the fact that this tool exists or that anyone who has been in the game sufficiently long enough has a right to use it.

The problem is people in rookie are using it (new players) and are gaining an advantage over other new players.

I'm currently in the mentoring program to help encourage new players to stay and enjoy this great game but i think unfairness issues like this will only hurt the game in the long run.
Sujay Warrier
(Group Pro - 3)



Posts: 955
  Country:
India 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (6)
Old post #234 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:53:19 Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:49:47 )

The problem is people in rookie are using it (new players)


And How do you know that they are doing it sucessfully ? Maybe they think its their perfect setup , but it most probably might not be the perfect setup ;)

Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:49:47 )

i think unfairness issues like this will only hurt the game in the long run.


How is this unfair ? You mean to say those who have worked hard to get data over a span of 8-10 seasons and have deviced a tool to help them , it becomes unfair ?

How about you try to device such a tool that will help you ;) ?
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #235 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:59:16 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 10:01:43 by Ivan Salfa) Quote 
Track conditions and car behaiviour is never the same. Even if you have 32 seasons of data. You can get close, but never the same.
Alan Horsley
(Group Amateur - 22)



Posts: 2084
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #236 posted Sep 20th 2012, 09:59:17 Quote 
Quote ( Sujay Warrier @ September 20th 2012,09:53:19 )

You mean to say those who have worked hard to get data over a span of 8-10 seasons and have deviced a tool to help


Depends on how it helps. If it gives them more laps free for other testing then that's fine but to give them a 7 mil advantage? That seems very excessive and gives them a huge advantage.

Quote ( Sujay Warrier @ September 20th 2012,09:53:19 )

How about you try to device such a tool that will help you ;) ?


I would use one if i absolutely had to in order to compete but i certainly wouldn't be happy about it.
Chris Lee
(Group Amateur - 16)


Posts: 582
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (2)   Dislike this post (2)
Old post #237 posted Sep 20th 2012, 10:03:26 Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:15:16 )

i would trust this tool but i would choose not to use it out of principal.


Principal? Ha! This is not about CO2 Emmissions! Not using this tool will not save the planet :D

The tools in use are the product of experience, vigilant data collection and sound maths. Why should experienced magangers not take advantage of this hard earned knowlege?

Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:49:47 )

The problem is people in rookie are using it (new players) and are gaining an advantage over other new players.


And if they want to pass it on to Rookies that's up to them. Who are you to try to stop them?
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (2)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #238 posted Sep 20th 2012, 10:03:31 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 10:04:35 by Ivan Salfa) Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:59:17 )

a 7 mil advantage


I think this is the only problem here. Thats what you are saying anyway.
Sujay Warrier
(Group Pro - 3)



Posts: 955
  Country:
India 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #239 posted Sep 20th 2012, 10:03:49 Quote 
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:59:17 )

Depends on how it helps.
Quote ( Alan Horsley @ September 20th 2012,09:59:17 )

but to give them a 7 mil advantage? That seems very excessive and gives them a huge advantage.


7 million might be excessive and might not please you , but is it not possible that the manager saving 7 mill on this might be overspending on some other factor ?

Even i know some guys who have done just 1 practice lap for the past 2 seasons and is earning loads of money . That does not mean it will guarantee to help him in the later stages of the game ;)
Ivan Salfa
(Group Rookie - 346)


Posts: 988
  Country:
Greece 
Certified: 
Like this post (5)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #240 posted Sep 20th 2012, 10:06:06 (last edited Sep 20th 2012, 10:06:34 by Ivan Salfa) Quote 
Quote ( Sujay Warrier @ September 20th 2012,10:03:49 )

7 million might be excessive and might not please you , but is it not possible that the manager saving 7 mill on this might be overspending on some other factor ?


Im trying hard to understand how your logic works
Page « 1 2 3 ... 7 [89 ... 22 23 24 » Quick go to page:

Reply to this topic