| Author |
Topic: second hand used parts |
41 replies
|
|
|
|
#31 posted Aug 14th 2019, 05:48:15 (last edited Aug 14th 2019, 06:02:08 by Lyee Chong)
|
Quote
|
The "selling" say is actually very confusing, and it leads people to misunderstand this idea to be a profit making suggestion, and further misleaded people into the possibility of possible exploitation of this idea.
What I understand from here is, there is no profit making, no selling. It probably just suggested an option for manager to *trade-in* a worn part for a less-worn part at cost. Knowing that what upgrade/replace/downgrade mechanism that we already have, I guess this suggestion suggests for option of "trade-in" what we currently have into a less-worn part of same level, or 1 level higher but not brand new.
What we are currently having is either we can upgrade/replace a worn part with a brand new part at any level but not 2 level higher than the current level at cost, or to down grade a part to lower level and less worn part for free.
And now, this is a suggestion of just to propose to have the option to "trade-in" for a less-worn part of same level or 1 level higher but not brand new, both at cost, which is an option we currently not having.
This no doubt gives more flexibility to part management, and I do not think it can make the game substantially easier simply by having this option make available. But does this game leaps over onto a new height with this get in place? Not what I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 posted Aug 14th 2019, 06:02:11
|
Quote
|
Quote ( Lyee Chong @ August 14th 2019,05:48:15 ) This no doubt gives more flexibility to part management, and I do not think it can make the game substantially easier simply by having this option make available
I disagree with you in this, it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer and takes away the planning.
So, n my case, I expect one part to reach 102% in the last race,so I have to plan my CTR to finish the last race without smoking by administrating my risks, replace/downgrade that part or smoke some laps that race (economically it is not sound to replace it).
I I could buy a part with some less wear it would definite make my life easier.
Quote ( Lyee Chong @ August 14th 2019,05:48:15 ) What I understand from here is, there is no profit making, no selling
Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 11th 2019,10:16:19 ) for example: sell engine with 70% wear.
I think you need to read again!
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 13th 2019,17:28:03 ) only saving
saving = less expenses == profit
and also:
Quote ( Eduardo Sanchez Carenzo @ August 14th 2019,06:02:11 ) it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer and takes away the planning.
QFT
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 posted Aug 14th 2019, 06:13:40
|
Quote
|
Ones need extraordinary courage to re-reading what Yakup wrote :) I would rather read once, and then play with my imagination in figuring out what he actually want to get across :P
I said it is more like a trade-in than anything else (especially not simply selling), because his "selling" in this idea is always follow up with a "buying", which lead me to believe this to be a trade-in plus cost/price. Especially when Yakup insisted that the idea od selling at low and buying at high action is not aim to make profit.
Well, this is only the best I can guess. I can not speak for Yakup for sure :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 posted Aug 14th 2019, 06:17:49
|
Quote
|
Quote ( Lyee Chong @ August 14th 2019,06:13:40 ) Ones need extraordinary courage to re-reading what Yakup wrote :) I would rather read once, and then play with my imagination in figuring out what he actually want to get across :P
+1
Quote ( Mikko Heikkinen @ August 14th 2019,06:03:00 ) and also:
Quote ( Eduardo Sanchez Carenzo @ August 14th 2019,06:02:11 )
it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer and takes away the planning.
QFT
In Mexico we have a "verb" (derived from the way a comedian popular in the 1950's and 60's) called "cantinflear" and that Is what I did.
so it whoud read:
it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer
Sorrty
|
|
|
|
1-we are sure.
2-same level
3-couldn't upgrade used parts, only level same part
4-goal : only saving the day
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 posted Aug 18th 2019, 10:45:53
|
Quote
|
Yakup however much you bang on about it , it will never suddenly be a good idea
You have been given multiple reasons why it's a bad idea again and again and again
Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 18th 2019,03:01:22 ) 4-goal : only saving the day
by saving the day , I presume you mean remove the need for proper money/part management :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 posted Aug 20th 2019, 12:18:56
|
Quote
|
Quote ( Peter Willmore @ August 18th 2019,10:45:53 ) by saving the day , I presume you mean remove the need for proper money/part management :)
Same here, so
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 posted Aug 20th 2019, 12:38:44
|
Quote
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 posted Aug 20th 2019, 14:41:25
|
Quote
|
I don’t know how to respond other than LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 posted Aug 20th 2019, 14:46:15
|
Quote
|
I would recommend using Yakup's ferocious techniques, like
Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 20th 2019,12:18:56 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 posted Aug 21st 2019, 09:49:18
|
Quote
|
Quote ( Kuba Szajbel @ August 20th 2019,14:46:15 ) I would recommend using Yakup's ferocious techniques, like
Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 20th 2019,12:18:56 )
thanks,
that's fine by me
|
|
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
