| Author |
Topic: Bugs and possible bugs |
5907 replies
|
|
|
Something's wrong. Testing PHA history shows 0-0-0 in last race, but in reality I had a gaining. Surely something went wrong with the post-race update bug, hope it's not too bad :)
Here: /gb/CCPHistory.asp?default=yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
How it's possible that after 14 races in my whole career (so just this season) I've got head to head ratio for example 14-1? Is it OK?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Tomasz Redziszewicz @ April 12th 2019,01:33:54 ) Hi,
How it's possible that after 14 races in my whole career (so just this season) I've got head to head ratio for example 14-1? Is it OK?
It seems as if during the post-race update issues last race the results for it were counted twice. It seems to be affecting everybody for last race right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Head to head bug has been fixed as well.
|
|
|
|
I had 0 tech problem laps last season (see racing résumé) but I did not receive the Reliability Expert achievement. :(
Don't tell me the pitstop for a puncture does count as a technical problem here? Because it's not considered a tech problem anywhere else in the game...
|
|
|
|
I trained my staff in efficiency before race 17 and gained 2 points, as expected.
My efficiency stat has now dropped a point though, which I didn't think could happen unless your trainable staff skill was/is higher than the max training level? (This is not the case here).
Is this a bug or is there another occasion/circumstance where staff trainables can drop?
|
|
|
|
|
Small bug from my R17 last season, I started to smoke on lap 37, it was a planned smoke, not a random. It was also the last lap I could do on my fuel. Driver went in for refueling pit stop, yet the reason for pitting on race analysis is "The car had a technical problem". Pit stop time suggests it was a standard pit for fuel though, also the smoking was not fixed, so I assume it's a display bug.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Ross Proud @ April 21st 2019,17:03:49 ) I trained my staff in efficiency before race 17 and gained 2 points, as expected.
My efficiency stat has now dropped a point though, which I didn't think could happen unless your trainable staff skill was/is higher than the max training level? (This is not the case here).
Is this a bug or is there another occasion/circumstance where staff trainables can drop?
Ross if your trainables are about 43.
Yes they will drop -1 in the reset.
I learnt that the hardway myself 😯
|
|
|
|
Race Analysis Page bug
More an annoying inconsistency in the page layout.
https://i.imgur.com/VRtuKsw.jpg
if you click the < arrow to the left of the magnifying glass icons at the top of the page you go to the next LATER race, but if you click the << to the left of 'Select a race' you go to the next EARLIER race.
Not a big issue, but can this be made consistent for both buttons please? Don't really care which is which as long as it is consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
Those big arrow's < or > scroll's the top line list left or right, the smaller one's << or >> select's previous or next race.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Dainius Vaškys @ April 22nd 2019,11:56:33 ) Those big arrow's < or > scroll's the top line list left or right, the smaller one's << or >> select's previous or next race.
Yes I realise that, but they are inconsistent in their application.
Clicking left should either be both earlier or both later in my opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clicking left on those big arrow's go's by 6 to the left, the same to the right, if you click on middle race analysis one and click on those arrow's you will see it for yourself, but I would like to be shortened to 3 maybe, 6 is a bit too much.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Dainius Vaškys @ April 22nd 2019,11:59:33 ) Clicking left on those big arrow's go's by 6 to the left, the same to the right, if you click on middle race analysis one and click on those arrow's you will see it for yourself, but I would like to be shortened to 3 maybe, 6 is a bit too much.
Yes but that is not the issue I mention.
One set moves to earlier races (be it 1 or 6 races) the other set (same direction arrow) moves to later races.
|
|
|
|
|
But that's the point of those arrow's, the big one's are made to scroll down the top list, while the smaller one's is to go by 1 step, so to speak :] If you make both arrow's to do the same, it will take more time to scroll down the list when searching for specific page or something we forgot :] (we can just choose from drop down list in case of a specific one)
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Dainius Vaškys @ April 22nd 2019,12:27:45 ) But that's the point of those arrow's, the big one's are made to scroll down the top list, while the smaller one's is to go by 1 step, so to speak :] If you make both arrow's to do the same, it will take more time to scroll down the list when searching for specific page or something we forgot :] (we can just choose from drop down list in case of a specific one)
No you do not get what I am saying, I don't want the buttons to do the same thing, I want them to go in the same direction.
Clicking on the << takes you to an earlier race, e.g. S69 R11 click << goes to S69 R10
but clicking on < takes you from S69 R11 to S69 R12, it moves the opposite direction in race history
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Graham Mercer @ April 22nd 2019,12:55:25 ) Quote ( Dainius Vaškys @ April 22nd 2019,12:27:45 )
But that's the point of those arrow's, the big one's are made to scroll down the top list, while the smaller one's is to go by 1 step, so to speak :] If you make both arrow's to do the same, it will take more time to scroll down the list when searching for specific page or something we forgot :] (we can just choose from drop down list in case of a specific one)
No you do not get what I am saying, I don't want the buttons to do the same thing, I want them to go in the same direction.
Clicking on the << takes you to an earlier race, e.g. S69 R11 click << goes to S69 R10
but clicking on < takes you from S69 R11 to S69 R12, it moves the opposite direction in race history
I know exactly what you mean Graham and totally agree with you, the whole search bar layout is counter intuitive and slow to use, plus the extremely annoying habit of taking so long to load, it just should be removed as we have a much easier and quicker search section below that works perfectly almost :-
The one thing that would make it better is if the managers group is also displayed along side the race in the drop down search list like it is on the Race Analysis heading and perhaps we can change the colour of the current race in the drop down list from blurry insipid Blue/Purple to maybe a nice vivid Gpro Green please :)
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Mike Bennett @ April 22nd 2019,14:47:30 ) I know exactly what you mean Graham and totally agree with you, the whole search bar layout is counter intuitive and slow to use, plus the extremely annoying habit of taking so long to load, it just should be removed as we have a much easier and quicker search section below that works perfectly almost :-
This here is for Vlad:
https://i.imgur.com/co5e9P3.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/AtzXqzS.png
And today the analysis page was surprisingly fast :)
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Andrew Wilden @ April 21st 2019,23:47:50 ) Quote ( Ross Proud @ April 21st 2019,17:03:49 )
I trained my staff in efficiency before race 17 and gained 2 points, as expected.
My efficiency stat has now dropped a point though, which I didn't think could happen unless your trainable staff skill was/is higher than the max training level? (This is not the case here).
Is this a bug or is there another occasion/circumstance where staff trainables can drop?
Ross if your trainables are about 43.
Yes they will drop -1 in the reset.
I learnt that the hardway myself 😯
Appreciate the response Andrew. The price you pay for the dizzy heights of 42!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Mikko Heikkinen @ April 22nd 2019,15:14:51 )
And today the analysis page was surprisingly fast :)
Back to normal today slow as always :(
it takes ~70% longer just to load the unnecessary search bar :-
https://imgur.com/ve5khM3
|
|
|
|
I am blocked due to having downloaded an antivirus that blocks advertisement. Since I could not withdraw, I was blocked.
Could you check with the game administrator to unlock me? I have already deleted the antivirus and the advertisements will be released.
And if possible, could you tell Leader Guzzo?
Thank you, my friend.
As you can see in the message above, I would like some help, as the manager, Marcelo Pinheiro, /br/ManagerProfile.asp?IDM=842815, who is part of the team Squadra Vincitore,
/br/TeamProfile.asp?TeamId=2126, you are having difficulties and I do not have the solution.
|
|
|
|
|
On the race setup screen why is the site telling me I have selected dry tyres to start the race when the track is wet but in actuality the track is 35 degrees and dry? Has anybody else had this? Obviously I've ignored it but I can see it causing a lot of problems for inexperienced managers who will probably switch to wets for the start of the race.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( David Andrewartha @ April 26th 2019,00:42:34 ) On the race setup screen why is the site telling me I have selected dry tyres to start the race when the track is wet but in actuality the track is 35 degrees and dry? Has anybody else had this? Obviously I've ignored it but I can see it causing a lot of problems for inexperienced managers who will probably switch to wets for the start of the race.
Last race start was on wet, GPRO remembers that. Annoying yes (and you get a pop-up for it when supporter), but not a bug
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jay De Snoo @ April 26th 2019,00:59:35 ) but not a bug
I would say that if the game is advising you to start a dry race on wet tyres it is most definitely a bug.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jay De Snoo @ April 26th 2019,00:59:35 ) Last race start was on wet, GPRO remembers that. Annoying yes (and you get a pop-up for it when supporter), but not a bug
Don't think that this is correct?
I am a supporter and didn't receive such warning.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( David Andrewartha @ April 26th 2019,00:42:34 ) On the race setup screen why is the site telling me I have selected dry tyres to start the race when the track is wet but in actuality the track is 35 degrees and dry? Has anybody else had this? Obviously I've ignored it but I can see it causing a lot of problems for inexperienced managers who will probably switch to wets for the start of the race. David, check if it it actually says it is the start tyre the one that's wrong, of it is simply that you chose the dry compound when it rains (not at the start)
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
