| Pengarang |
Topik: teams and double accounts |
891 balasan
|
|
|
|
I actually think a team that finds they had a DA has already suffered enough by releasing their info to another team, probably.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Well, we were probably alright because our data is very secure, but there's still the chance he took it all.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Nigel Hawken @ June 1st 2013,20:45:01 ) I actually think a team that finds they had a DA has already suffered enough by releasing their info to another team, probably.
That is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Nigel Hawken @ June 1st 2013,20:45:01 )
I actually think a team that finds they had a DA has already suffered enough by releasing their info to another team, probably.
Works both ways, they might be getting information from other teams in return.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Shoaib Mohamed @ June 1st 2013,20:55:32 ) I agree with Finn!
What a momentous occasion!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ June 1st 2013,20:27:28 ) I see no reason why they shouldn't be removed from a team straight away if they are shadow-confirmed DAs. I'm happy to believe must teams would not knowingly have one so they shouldn't be further punished.
The point about them not losing team points earned by the DA isn't relevant, IMO as the team believed it had a genuine member, and of not for the DA, would of had a genuine member scoring those points.
I must have missed the moment when began Mr Shadow confirming DAs. To my knowledge, no DA has ever officially been announced by Mr Shadow. On that basis there is no justification for the automatic removal of a banned account from a team.
|
|
|
|
Maybe it is just me but I find the leap from no official statement of DA by Shadow to there being no justification for team removal of permanently retired accounts a little hard to follow.
How about this then, I suggest that teams should be able to instantly kick players with a login ban without delay or cost. Getting a login ban would probably constitue some type of bad behaviour that breaches most teams code of conduct. This would allow teams to get rid of rotten eggs while the non-existance of DA's remain intact.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Winkley @ June 1st 2013,23:45:23 ) I must have missed the moment when began Mr Shadow confirming DAs.
While no DA has officially been named, we can all see when action has been taken on one, especially if you are in a team with one. Hard for someone to ask for an R next to their name when they haven't logged in (because they can't).
If you wish to look at it as Shadow hasn't confirmed them, then let's say anyone who retires with immediate effect is automatically removed from their team, as they can't do it themselves of they aren't signing in (as they can't).
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Pål Göran Stensson @ June 1st 2013,23:58:31 ) Maybe it is just me but I find the leap from no official statement of DA by Shadow to there being no justification for team removal of permanently retired accounts a little hard to follow.
How about this then, I suggest that teams should be able to instantly kick players with a login ban without delay or cost. Getting a login ban would probably constitue some type of bad behaviour that breaches most teams code of conduct. This would allow teams to get rid of rotten eggs while the non-existance of DA's remain intact.
Mr Shadow won't do anything that singlehandedly points to an account having been banned.
Edit: Kevin, the most recent departure from my team was as a result of being kicked. Was it a DA? Your logic says yes, but reality says no; people can, and do, leave without requesting an R next to their name, and not having one is not an indication that an account was a DA.
|
|
|
|
|
I said no such thing, Michael. Quite the opposite. That's more than one today you've voiced an opinion without actually reading properly.
The DA (alleged) in Finn's team does have a forced R against his name while not online to request it. That is why it is clear to his team what has happened, officially confirmed or not. I see no reason why the team should be stuck with him when he's gone for good.
|
|
|
|
I asked Mr Shadow - He said he closed the account.
Have none of you ever tried to ask??
|
|
|
|
|
I agree that publicly naming and the fallout from that is not needed, but in this kind of situation, letting him be removed from the team or, even better, automatically removing him seems appropriate to me.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ June 1st 2013,19:57:59 ) I don't know why we should get punished for it Have to agree.
|
|
|
|
|
Automatic removal from the team concerned sounds a pretty reasonable solution. But what happens if that DA is the TL does the team disband - purely technical question.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Mark Wright @ June 2nd 2013,00:58:08 ) But what happens if that DA is the TL does the team disband - purely technical question.
Happens the same that happens if the team leader leaves the team by himself: spot #2 takes over the lead automatically. If TL is the only member of the team, team gets liquidated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No next person just steps up
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers guys just curious ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Michael, as Kevin points out, there is conclusive evidence in the user profile that the account has been terminated by external source. Allowing the team to kick such an account from the roster would not make it any more public than it already is.
|
|
|
|
|
E: sorry, I just realised this was almost level to the terrible 'banter' someone like Mark Webster would post. please delete
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Mr. Shadow and explain you forgot to create a new account before logging in with the the one you already have. I'm sure he will understand :p
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Dansk
Pirate
