| Pengarang |
Topik: Negative wear :D |
74 balasan
|
|
|
|
#1 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 05:43:56
|
Sebut
|
well as some of you may know I did a full upgrade before the last race and today I log in and what do I find :)
Sidepods 9 -1%
Well I do like the idea of parts getting better with each race, but I think I should point this out :).
Some other parts have also got 0% wear (not that I'm complaining :D).
Ahh... if only the Engine would have got 0% :(.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 06:09:16
|
Sebut
|
|
Well my damages are also quite low... Maybe this track had some sort of repairing effect? Altough my engine got ripped quite much :(
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 06:18:28
|
Sebut
|
|
You seem to have worn your overdraft out. :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 06:23:55
|
Sebut
|
I have the same situation
Sidepods, wear -1% (minus one) :)
No comment :O
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 06:31:37
|
Sebut
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 07:41:19
|
Sebut
|
I have Electronics wear -1%. (Was 0% before the race).
I guess we should just wait for Steffl to wake up and fix this ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 07:47:20
|
Sebut
|
|
I hope if it will get fixed, people can redo their upgrade again, as I've already done that and it could go terribly wrong if some parts would suddenly get some more wear. ;o) I didn't get negative wear, by the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 07:48:41
|
Sebut
|
Wear
front wing = 0
sidepods = -1
electronics = 0
Maybe it's not bug? :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 dikirim Mac 7 2007, 07:59:38
|
Sebut
|
I also did my repair, and had no negative wear :)
If this is changed, please a refund on the parts i did buy, + 15% for the wages of my staff working hours, thank you admins :)
|
|
|
|
|
Negative wear here too. But please don't take is as a complain :)
|
|
|
|
I would like to suggest Stefan to leave this as is for now (or at least change all -1% to 0%), but fix for next time we race at Fiorano, and let ppl go on with repairs. We can consider this as a pleasant bonus.
|
|
|
|
I would guess this is a mistake somewhere, and maybe partly down to the S3 changes that mean that higher parts don't always have less wear :)
My lvl3/2 parts don't seem to have been effected though :( at work so can't tell if they've gone up or down until later.
|
|
|
|
|
After a better look, my wear is not negative. Just very low on some components.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes i also got low wear on some parts! But this time i like it ;)
|
|
|
|
hmm - wear is about 10 'points' less (on every part) then expected here
example:
wear before race 20
wear after race expected 37
wear instead 27
btw - no complaining here too :))
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, as I've seen also now, the wear of some parts wasnt set very wisely... But we wont change the usage afterwards for this race surely. But I will change those -1% to 0%. Then your part isnt anymore that shiny and blinking, its just only new :D
|
|
|
|
|
People wanted to repair their parts and there you go. Just race and voila, better then new :).
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Stefan Voggenreither @ March 7th 2007,10:52:08 )
Yep, as I've seen also now, the wear of some parts wasnt set very wisely... But we wont change the usage afterwards for this race surely. But I will change those -1% to 0%. Then your part isnt anymore that shiny and blinking, its just only new :D
Can we repair now, when there are -1% parts in the car? Or we should wait until you change -1% to 0%?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Maxim Kotov @ March 7th 2007,12:37:56 )
Can we repair now, when there are -1% parts in the car? Or we should wait until you change -1% to 0%?
You can repair if you like. You can also repair that part with -1% to 0%, then I dont have to reset it.... ;-)
|
|
|
|
Stefan
my fuel comsuption dont check with previus one
very very low in this race !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
like raining the whole time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
please could you check
i know there are less thaan 300 km but
is unusual low
and track says very high!!!!!
thanks
|
|
|
|
the right distance is 238.6 kms (quite a lot way down compared to usual)
My fuel consumption was exactly as expected.
if there is a problem it does not occur for everybody.
|
|
|
|
|
Mariano, I've checked your fuelusage and its correct the way it is. Maybe you should compare it more carefully to other tracks? :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
but my usage was .xxl/km or y.z ls/lap
and that not high or very high
thats low
very low
Start fuel: XX liters
Stop 1:
(Lap 31) No more fuel was left
Edited by Admin (do not post exact data in the forums!)
|
|
|
|
ok you edit data
but
am I right or not?
|
|
|
|
|
I was lower than usual, but only a little. It varies, I think?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Mariano Torregomez @ March 7th 2007,17:58:48 )
ok you edit data
but
am I right or not?
I know that one of my team mates miscalculated and had to do an extra stop, even though he used almost the same amount of fuel per kilometer as on another track that had same fuel consumption...so a given level is not an exact amount of fuel per kilometer, I think, but rather a small range...perhaps you just hit below that range...
|
|
|
|
Mariano: I don't do any exact calculations (like +-15L per race), but for me it worked ok.
(but I'm not sure what kind of range are you speaking about, maybe 30L range is too much for you)
|
|
|
|
|
The fuel seemed right on the money to me.
|
|
|
|
|
If anything, it was too high than expected :)
|
|
|
|
can we have Fiorano as a test track?
It would be nice to test without wear in some parts ;-)
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Dansk
Pirate
