| Thi' Captain Spake |
Jabb'r: Suggestions |
's many 's 5783 answ'rs
|
|
|
Indeed, an option to merge, and then an option to disband or separate from a sister team, would solve this. Perhaps an option for the main team leader to invoke or revoke viewing rights to the team forum would also work, similar to how rights are revoked once the supporter threshold is breached for a team forum.
It's no different from if a main and sister team disbands from an external forum really. The main team carries on as normal, the sister team leaves, but the sister team would've learned a lot and saved some data. I don't see why that can't be a thing internally.
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a bunch of sunshine and rainbows then. Make it happen, Vlad.
|
|
|
|
It will be great if we could see how much team points manager scored in every team in the "team history" section of manager profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Points. I can't find the sense of percents in this tab
|
|
|
|
Well you never know what people want, but clarification never harms. I can’t see what harm it would do, I suppose it could negatively effect managers who often push there teams into divisions a level above there current package/knowledge in regards to team acceptance
this could be seen as positive or negative depending we’re you stand.
if it were implemented I think a change of colour for the seasons were drivers are not scoring full points as in the team section would be of some use.
Although sounds daft at first, what about seasons when a) points lost due to team under 2 drivers?
b) when not actually in a team?
C) when accumulation points across several teams
i would argue that it should show regardless of points a) & b) and by extension across several teams, a “this is what I could of scored”, possibly maybe take the earlier suggestion of points drain for not long standing off in this tally.
|
|
|
|
That's too much of complicated questions :) it could be much easier.
Just for example
Alexei Malkin established team Force One
/
950 points
May 8th 2016, 12:27:46 Season 53, Race 1 Alexei Malkin left team Midland F1 Racing
Mar 16th 2016, 16:25:57 Season 52, Race 3 Alexei Malkin joined team Midland F1 Racing
/
6 points
Mar 16th 2016, 16:11:13 Season 52, Race 3 Alexei Malkin left team Midland F1 Team
Oct 24th 2013, 14:18:45 Season 38, Race 14 Alexei Malkin joined team Midland-Junior F1 Racing
/
600 pts
Oct 24th 2013, 14:18:16 Season 38, Race 14 Alexei Malkin left team Midland F1 Racing Academy
Sep 24th 2013, 16:54:34 Season 38, Race 5 Alexei Malkin joined team Midland F1 Racing Academy
/
16 pts
Sep 18th 2013, 15:55:45 Season 38, Race 4 Alexei Malkin left team KAMAZ-Master
May 7th 2013, 19:14:17 Season 36, Race 3 Alexei Malkin joined team KAMAZ-Master
/
53 pts
No team means no team points
|
|
|
|
ah you mean in your "Team History" part and not "Manger History" part
well that's easy to locate and find out, provided you don't mind a team overall rather than separate stints if you have been to the same team several times, personally I don't see the point of it, although I cant see the harm in it either.
I wouldn't be averted to it being in your "manager history" logged every season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Neil Bontemps @ July 12th 2019,19:39:08 )
Just a quick fix, love the new graphic engine and its great watching the race, is there anyway we can update the Silverstone track pic to match the actual circuit in the track information listing? Unnecessary. (statistics!!!)
|
|
|
|
Likely suggested before, but couldn't find it: any chance the car character (P,H,A or B) can be added to the team and friends lists?
|
|
|
|
An adjustable CT Risk for 3 laps before and after pitstops.
Maybe you want to take it easy the or Maybe you want your driver to give everything.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Kim Van Der Stichelen @ July 14th 2019,15:27:52 ) An adjustable CT Risk for 3 laps before and after pitstops.
Maybe you want to take it easy the or Maybe you want your driver to give everything.
We already have that it is called Boost Laps
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Eduardo Sanchez Carenzo @ July 14th 2019,17:44:46 ) We already have that it is called Boost Laps
No we don't. Boosting doesn't mean take it easy. He's asking for an either take it easy OR push harder, for 3 laps before and after pit stops.
Quote ( Kim Van Der Stichelen @ July 14th 2019,15:27:52 ) An adjustable CT Risk for 3 laps before and after pitstops.
Maybe you want to take it easy the or Maybe you want your driver to give everything.
More options would be good. I'd suggest adjustable CT for "x laps before" and "x laps after"pit stop though.
And either per stint or per laps too, so one can slow down in the last stint or last 20 laps.
If not per stint then per 2 segments;
"Start with xx CT"
"at lap x change to xx CT"
If that was conditional too it would be even greater, like;
"at lap x change to xx CT but only if (placement under or over x, mm:ss ahead of x place, mm:ss ahead of rival, mm:ss behind leader, a.s.o)"
But I also think anything new in way of tactics won't come until the new engine is ready, and hopefully come with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Good Afternoon to all from Sithonia.!!! ...Enjoy your Life.!!!
...well I Thing Another Extreme Heretic Suggest.!!! ...Prepare your Weapons to soot.!!!
- We Have the CTRisk on the Race where we have EXTRA WEARS from That.!!! OK.??? ...OK very Good.
...When we Use Zero Risk CTR=0 we have ZERO Extra Wears.!!! ...Ok.??? ...Ok that Normal too.
- Why we can not Have a Negative CTR.??? -50% for example to Drive UNDER the Normal Way and Save Wears from the Basic Wears of the Race.???
- I suggest so to Have AND NEGATIVE Clear Track Risk.!!! (Mathematics are Mathematics)
:)
|
|
|
|
Excellent, I want my driver to be able to refresh his car's parts just by going around the track.
|
|
|
|
Isn't that the same as the current situation?
If you regard 25CT as base line, anything below would be 'negative' and result in less wear. Just shifting numbers
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure about that, but if you want to save your parts, isn't it better to not race? /s
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Marco Ferraz @ July 19th 2019,17:15:01 ) I'm not sure about that, but if you want to save your parts, isn't it better to not race? /s
no... you will lose bonus in end of season...
|
|
|
|
That was actually sarcasm, Martti. I know about the bonus, just joking about the idea of a negative CT that can be exploited. Unless the admins changes how the wear works, of course.
|
|
|
|
- Why Boys its Ubnormal to run a race with low puce Engine to save wear.?????
...thats happen Everywere.!!!
...where you Find the No Logic.???
It's not nesesery to Have -100% Risk.!!! ...we can put a Max limit to -35% or -50%.!!!
:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
You already can run with a low puce engine, by going 0 CT. ;)
|
|
|
|
ok.!!! ...it's difficult to Free your Minds.!!! ...no Problem.-
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon.
I want to give a suggestion of change in the game.
Friend, I find it very annoying this practice used by users to "lose" races to lower the driver's motivation. I believe that the idea of motivation was not created for this purpose. The idea should be to increase the performance of the riders and not be used to "cheat" the pilot's maximum points system at each level.
My suggestion is to unlink the motivation of the pilot's total points, just as energy is today.
The game must be entertaining, and we have an excellent game, but changes can make the game even better. There is nothing more annoying than missing a race day because you need to "lose" to lower the driver's motivation. I leave my suggestion.
I apologize for my English from google translator.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Ioannis Kalogirou @ July 19th 2019,17:26:27 ) It's not nesesery to Have -100% Risk.!!! ...we can put a Max limit to -35% or -50%.!!!
The problem is not that the game runs with logic from real life, or kind of, but more based on numbers.
If there's negative CT added, and people notices with their actual formulas that a part can get negative wear, that would lead to some exploits, and also would mean that changes about the formula has to be done. which implies that a massive percentage of our data is completely useless.
Not sure about people's opinions, but I don't think they're gonna enjoy redoing months and months of planning just for one formula.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Ioannis Kalogirou @ July 19th 2019,17:31:54 ) ok.!!! ...it's difficult to Free your Minds.!!! ...no Problem.-
Does using -50 ct risk mean if I start with an engine at 90% worn I will finish with it @ 45%?
But does it also mean that in a 50 lap race I only do 25 laps?
Also what happens to my tyres ?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Jones @ July 19th 2019,17:54:39 ) Quote ( Ioannis Kalogirou @ July 19th 2019,17:31:54 )
ok.!!! ...it's difficult to Free your Minds.!!! ...no Problem.-
Does using -50 ct risk mean if I start with an engine at 90% worn I will finish with it @ 45%?
But does it also mean that in a 50 lap race I only do 25 laps?
Also what happens to my tyres ?
In Mechwarrior Online they had to invent an anti gravity engine for 1 mech. It weighed in at -2.5 tons. Imagine that in here
|
|
|
|
Just think that a negative CT just lower the wear, not do something negative.
But according to @Andre Verhoek (A45) if you move your point of view and consider 50 actual CT to 0 future, you can balance between - 50 and +50
Math are here 😂
You will get at -50 the actual 0 wear
Energy must change with this 😝
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Jones @ July 19th 2019,17:54:39 ) Does using -50 ct risk mean if I start with an engine at 90% worn I will finish with it @ 45%?
But does it also mean that in a 50 lap race I only do 25 laps?
Also what happens to my tyres ?
No dear Michael don't mean That.!!! Mathematics are Clear.!!!
...if for a Race you have a BASIC WEAR 25% in a track ...you Jast have with negative Risk 5-10% less THAN BASIC.!!! ...Not happen that you say. It's so SIMPLE.!!!!!
...we Run with less speed than Normal and Have Less BASIC Wears.!!!!
:)
:)
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
