Страна « 1 [2 Иди на страну:
Аутор Тема: second hand used parts 36 одговора
Lyee Chong
(Група Amateur - 61)



ГПРО особље
Поруке: 1214
  Држава:
Малезија 
Сертификат: 
Свиђа ми се (0)   Не свиђа ми се (0)
Стара порука #31 послано Aвг 14 2019, 05:48:15 (последња промена Aвг 14 2019, 06:02:08 од Lyee Chong) Цитирај 
The "selling" say is actually very confusing, and it leads people to misunderstand this idea to be a profit making suggestion, and further misleaded people into the possibility of possible exploitation of this idea.

What I understand from here is, there is no profit making, no selling. It probably just suggested an option for manager to *trade-in* a worn part for a less-worn part at cost. Knowing that what upgrade/replace/downgrade mechanism that we already have, I guess this suggestion suggests for option of "trade-in" what we currently have into a less-worn part of same level, or 1 level higher but not brand new.

What we are currently having is either we can upgrade/replace a worn part with a brand new part at any level but not 2 level higher than the current level at cost, or to down grade a part to lower level and less worn part for free.
And now, this is a suggestion of just to propose to have the option to "trade-in" for a less-worn part of same level or 1 level higher but not brand new, both at cost, which is an option we currently not having.

This no doubt gives more flexibility to part management, and I do not think it can make the game substantially easier simply by having this option make available. But does this game leaps over onto a new height with this get in place? Not what I believe.
Eduardo Sanchez Carenzo
(Група Pro - 1)


Поруке: 2126
  Држава:
Мексико 
Сертификат: 
Свиђа ми се (0)   Не свиђа ми се (0)
Стара порука #32 послано Aвг 14 2019, 06:02:11 Цитирај 
Quote ( Lyee Chong @ August 14th 2019,05:48:15 )

This no doubt gives more flexibility to part management, and I do not think it can make the game substantially easier simply by having this option make available


I disagree with you in this, it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer and takes away the planning.

So, n my case, I expect one part to reach 102% in the last race,so I have to plan my CTR to finish the last race without smoking by administrating my risks, replace/downgrade that part or smoke some laps that race (economically it is not sound to replace it).

I I could buy a part with some less wear it would definite make my life easier.

Quote ( Lyee Chong @ August 14th 2019,05:48:15 )

What I understand from here is, there is no profit making, no selling


Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 11th 2019,10:16:19 )

for example: sell engine with 70% wear.


I think you need to read again!
Mikko Heikkinen
(Група Master - 3)



Поруке: 11702
  Држава:
Финска 
Сертификат: 
Свиђа ми се (1)   Не свиђа ми се (0)
Стара порука #33 послано Aвг 14 2019, 06:03:00 (последња промена Aвг 14 2019, 06:05:37 од Mikko Heikkinen) Цитирај 
Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 13th 2019,17:28:03 )

only saving


saving = less expenses == profit


and also:
Quote ( Eduardo Sanchez Carenzo @ August 14th 2019,06:02:11 )

it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer and takes away the planning.

QFT
Lyee Chong
(Група Amateur - 61)



ГПРО особље
Поруке: 1214
  Држава:
Малезија 
Сертификат: 
Свиђа ми се (0)   Не свиђа ми се (0)
Стара порука #34 послано Aвг 14 2019, 06:13:40 Цитирај 
Ones need extraordinary courage to re-reading what Yakup wrote :) I would rather read once, and then play with my imagination in figuring out what he actually want to get across :P

I said it is more like a trade-in than anything else (especially not simply selling), because his "selling" in this idea is always follow up with a "buying", which lead me to believe this to be a trade-in plus cost/price. Especially when Yakup insisted that the idea od selling at low and buying at high action is not aim to make profit.

Well, this is only the best I can guess. I can not speak for Yakup for sure :)
Eduardo Sanchez Carenzo
(Група Pro - 1)


Поруке: 2126
  Држава:
Мексико 
Сертификат: 
Свиђа ми се (0)   Не свиђа ми се (0)
Стара порука #35 послано Aвг 14 2019, 06:17:49 Цитирај 
Quote ( Lyee Chong @ August 14th 2019,06:13:40 )

Ones need extraordinary courage to re-reading what Yakup wrote :) I would rather read once, and then play with my imagination in figuring out what he actually want to get across :P


+1



Quote ( Mikko Heikkinen @ August 14th 2019,06:03:00 )

and also:
Quote ( Eduardo Sanchez Carenzo @ August 14th 2019,06:02:11 )

it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer and takes away the planning.

QFT


In Mexico we have a "verb" (derived from the way a comedian popular in the 1950's and 60's) called "cantinflear" and that Is what I did.

so it whoud read:

it takes the majority of planning away,and makes things easier for managers to administer

Sorrty
Yakup Paçacı
(Група Amateur - 7)



Поруке: 508
  Држава:
Турска 
Сертификат: 
Свиђа ми се (0)   Не свиђа ми се (4)
Стара порука #36 послано данас у 03:01:22 (последња промена данас у 03:02:24 од Yakup Paçacı) Цитирај 
1-we are sure.
2-same level
3-couldn't upgrade used parts, only level same part
4-goal : only saving the day
Peter Willmore
(Група Pro - 3)


Поруке: 3197
  Држава:
Енглеска 
Сертификат: 
Свиђа ми се (1)   Не свиђа ми се (0)
Стара порука #37 послано данас у 10:45:53 Цитирај 
Yakup however much you bang on about it , it will never suddenly be a good idea

You have been given multiple reasons why it's a bad idea again and again and again

Quote ( Yakup Paçacı @ August 18th 2019,03:01:22 )

4-goal : only saving the day


by saving the day , I presume you mean remove the need for proper money/part management :)
Страна « 1 [2 Иди на страну:

Одговори